Knopf (Random House, distributor), New York.ĭeutsch, Morton. The vanishing American Jew: in search of Jewish identity for the next centuryĭeutsch, Karl. Ethnic and Racial Studies 1:377–400ĪrticleTitleBeyond reason: the nature of the ethnonational bondĮthnonationalism: the quest for understanding A nation is a nation, is a state, is an ethnic group, is a. Occurrence Handle10.1023/B:RYSO.0000021405.18890.63ĪrticleTitleReligion and ethnicity: Judaism in the ethnic consciousness of contemporary Russian JewsĪrticleTitleNation-building or nation-destroying?Ĭonnor, Walker. Nationalism reframed: nationhood and the national question in the New Europe The Anthropology of Ethnicity: Beyond “Ethnic Groups and Boundaries”ĪrticleTitleClass approaches to race and ethnicityĪrticleTitleApportionment of racial diversity: a review Redard (ed.) Indo-Iranica, Harassowitz, Wiesbaden.Įthnic groups and boundaries: the social organization of cultural differencesĮnduring and emerging issues in the analysis of ethnicity Ethnic processes on the Pathan-Baluch boundary. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 94:4516–4519.ĪrticleTitleEcologic relationships of ethnic groups in Swat, North Pakistan Occurrence Handle10.1525/ae.1995.22.3.02a00010ĪrticleTitleModelling ethnic and national relationsīarbujani, Guido, Arianna Magagni, Eric Minch & Luigi L. I will focus primarily on the terms ‘ethnic group’, ‘nation’, and ‘nationalism’, and I will make the following points: (1) so-called ‘ethnic groups’ are collections of people with a common cultural identity, plus an ideology of membership by descent and normative endogamy (2) the ‘group’ in ‘ethnic group’ is a misleading misnomer-these are not ‘groups’ but categories, so I propose to call them ‘ethnies’ (3) ‘nationalism’ mostly refers to the recent ideology that ethnies-cultural communities with a self-conscious ideology of self-sufficient reproduction-be made politically sovereign (4) it is very confusing to use ‘nationalism’ also to stand for ‘loyalty to a multi-ethnic state’ because this is the exact opposite (5) a ‘nation’ truly exists only in a politician’s imagination, so analysts should not pretend that establishing whether something ‘really’ is or is not ‘a nation’ matters (6) a big analytic cost is paid every time an ‘ethnie’ is called a ‘nation’ because this mobilizes the intuition that nationalism is indispensable to ethnic organization (not true), which thereby confuses the very historical process-namely, the recent historical emergence of nationalism-that must be explained (7) another analytical cost is paid when scholars pretend that ethnicity is a form of kinship-it is not.įaith or fear: how Jews can survive in a Christian AmericaĪrticleTitleThe Vezo are not a kind of people: identity, difference, and “ethnicity” among a fishing people of western Madagascar My approach to these questions has been informed by anthropological and evolutionary-psychological questions. This makes a conceptual cleaning-up unavoidable, and it is especially salutary to attempt it now that more economists are becoming interested in the effects of identity on behavior, so that they may begin with the best conceptual tools possible. It has been difficult to make progress in the study of ethnicity and nationalism because of the multiple confusions of analytic and lay terms, and the sheer lack of terminological standardization (often even within the same article).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |